I have used both for some time and I don't think that the stands a chance to the when it comes to sound quality. Post by Plattenwechsler » 21 Jun Hello, in my humble opinion, the ist the most workable of all Duals. It has excellent performance and very solid workmanship. In comparison to the mechanically similar the has belt drive and herewith NO delicate electronics. I consider the and the both idler wheel drive the most beautiful models.
Insider's tips are the and , small but very well-crafted belt drive turntables with astonishing accurate surface feel! Isn't it better than the ? I know that the platter's lighet, but isn't the 's EDS motor the improved version of the 's EDS motor? If there is one, it is not noticable and not audible.
The main difference between the Dual and the is the tonearm: The has continuous vertical tonearm control, i. But thus it is also more interference-prone. I consider the the best sounding Dual ever. I use it every day, while my collects dust on top of the closet The is the most advanced record changer. It was released on occasion of Dual's 75th anniversary in So it is very collectible.
Performance is not inferior to or Greetings Marc. Dual vs. Dual Post by ElwoodB » 18 Aug ok now I have such a dillema: I've recently acquired a Dual , but it seems that something's wrong with the tonearm mount or bearings so that's needs to be fixed BUT the guy from which I've bought the turntable has also a on sale and I may have a chance at swapping the turntables Well, as old as gold also means that it is usually not easily found. It can still be found on eBay click here though , but you might need to screen through a few.
Some fans of have touted it as being one of the best inventions in the technological age. Yes, it can be said to be so as it is reliable, stable and a good performer especially with low rumble. These reasons contribute to the Dual being one of the best dual turntables. Yes, you may be surprised to learn that the Dual is a fully automatic turntable.
This is one of the reasons why its popular as people are getting more lazy, automatic functions become more attractive to audiophiles. Furthermore, this Dual turntable has the ability to spin several albums at one go. This means that you can just leave it spinning from wherever you are to enjoy the music.
Sometimes automatic turntables experience problems as they are not smooth in operation. But the Dual works smoothly without needing one to stand beside to do monitoring work, hence its popularity. The Dual comes with a heavy weight platter and this helps to reduce the wow or flutter almost to zero.
For those lazy audiophiles, having a low level of rumble is a great plus point when spinning your records on the Dual Although the tonearm is longer than usual for an automatic turntable, the tonearm friction is reduced significantly with the deployment of the Gimbal bearing type. The renowned quality build can be observed in this model from the outside. Thankfully the Dual turntables did not position itself to be that of the high end pricey segment or even collectible items.
Due to this, many often overlook the Dual as great turntables — hidden gem! From the appearance, one can tell that the Dual turntable exudes personality and classiness, reminiscent of its other sibling models. With an affordable price and excellent durability, its hard not to consider it amongst one of the best dual turntables around. You may face some difficulties in some countries. This is because of some important components becoming more difficult to source for such as idler wheels and purchasing replacements may not be cheap.
However, the good thing is that duals are well-appreciated in many places to the extent that any turntable repair shop that has dealings with Garrads, Linns, or Thorens will also be able to help with Duals.
Just a word of caution, because of the accumulation of lubricant over years, the dual turntables will require a thorough touching up after buying.
Should you be one of those hands-off folks like me, you can always seek professional assistance. Fast local enquiries always pays-off to be sure someone experienced in the vicinity can help if you need it.
If you can, please avoid the Grados cartridges , because it produces disproportion hum with the Dual Of all the Dual turntables, this model is amongst one of our favorites. For an automatic turntable, the Dual turntable can be said to be one of the best dual turntables that is most meticulously designed with high standard of reliability. If you were to google the difference, you might come across a huge flood of information debating on a few issues during the comparison.
Some of the issues surfaced revolved around the material of the tonearm and the headshell. Well, to some of us it can be quite a pain to sieve through so much unnecessary information just to know some of the main differences. So over here, we will single out some differences that you may find helpful to know. Maybe even a low mid-grade table. Jcricket , Mar 14, Messages: 1, Location: Texas. I had what i beleived was a CS in the '80s that I was impressed with.
This feat amazed all that I showed it to. Messages: 13, Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico. I have the Q and am very impressed with it. Messages: 3, Location: Kansas City.
I have a ,, and a , my favorite is the You can cue the arm and move it over the platter without the motor turning on, the series turns on. Small difference, just a matter of what you are use to I suppose.
Theoretically the and should sound better due to the longer arms. The only difference between the two is the has a lighted strobe. In the series watch for older the they do not have an anti skate, the SK does the does too.
Rybeam , Mar 14, I'd say the most popular is the The is tough to beat. You need to be careful when obtaining a Early ones had some serious design flaws - most notably, the cue control is disabled when stacking records. Dual had a production change about a third of the way through the production run, and the later ones are much more desirable.
You can tell the difference easily. Where the tonearm changes height for stacking records, the early versions say SP single play and MP multiple play. The later ones simply say Single and Multi.
I like the operation of the Q - just push a button on the front of the table and off it goes - the quartz controlled motor is rock solid stable. I love the looks of the CS It sounds good, too. Best value out there would be the A really nice table.
There - as clear as mud? I guess I like 'em all! Messages: 4, Location: DFW. Messages: Location: Wilmington, NC. Messages: 2, Location: Jasper, GA. Well, that depends on what your objectives are. Do you prefer idler arm, direct drive, or belt crive?
0コメント